Every home like this has the same WiFi problem, and it has nothing to do with how much the house is worth. The better built the house, the worse it is for signal: solid double brick and heavy sound insulation are close to the ideal material for blocking WiFi. Add a house old enough that no network cabling was ever run, and a finish that nobody is going to let you drill into, and the conventional answer — run a cable — is off the table before you start.
In a home like this the router is usually fine and the walls are the problem. Solid double brick with sound insulation blocks WiFi far more than plasterboard does, which is why the living room shows full bars while a bedroom two walls away drops out. The fix is not a stronger router in the same spot — it is not putting the signal through those walls in the first place.
| Wired backhaul | Dedicated-band wireless | |
|---|---|---|
| Needs cabling | Yes — ruled out here | No |
| Speed between nodes | Best available | Nodes talk on their own channel, so throughput holds up |
| Shares capacity with your devices | No | No, when a dedicated backhaul band is used |
| Placement matters | Less — the cable does the work | Critical — nodes must avoid the thickest walls |
| Fits this house | No | Yes |
With no cable route and no drilling allowed, whole-home coverage was built on Deco mesh nodes using a dedicated backhaul band, positioned along the hallway and doorways so the relay path avoids the thickest solid double-brick walls rather than trying to penetrate them. Walk-testing confirmed seamless roaming from the balcony through to the furthest ensuite bedroom, with video calls and 4K streaming holding without dropouts or manual switching.
Call or message us — 90% of messages get a reply within an hour.
Call 0420 119 140 Send a Message